Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
62
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 06:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
I don't like this policy change at all - how is anyone supposed to undertake a high sec war now?
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
74
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 12:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ambassadeur Ur-Shulgi wrote:Thorn Galen wrote:I'm guilty of complaining about this as much as most other posters here.
The GM, however, is correct in what he has said.
I have sat back and have tried to come-up with a proper, functional solution to this problem. One that does not require policing by CCP. I am coming-up blank, I have no solution, no ideas which could be implemented in code.
Good grief, the mechanics of it are a nightmare! Sit back and try it, I dare you. Anyone out there with a viable, functional solution that can be coded ?
It's so easy for us to complain, it's way more difficult to find a working solution though. The current situation is horrible, but what to do ? Policing it actively with GM's is not a good answer, it apparently never worked properly anyway.
In the meantime I predict that suicide ganking will be on the increase, mainly due to the wardec mechanics not functioning.
Peace out. I have a solution for you Shut down Wardecing Mechanic... If people want to pvp they can do it in Low sec and Null. Stop Suicide ganking in highsec by taking away the abillity to fire on other players. Fixing this might get EvE subscription base up to 1 million subs. And that to me Is personaly worth getting rid of most of the griefers. They are in the way of progress. Anarchists, psychopaths and the criminaly insane people have alaways been taken care of in IRL. If we had let Our world function like EvE you would not be able to step out your front door without a shootgun posse having your back. Its Unrealistic that EvE is not Policed more, A society can't function If you let the sociopaths run Free. It crumbles into chaos and despair. In EvE that translates to declining Subscriptions as most people dont like to get stomped on. Now facts are clear we cant keep going like this or the game will die. Hopefully CCP undestand this and puts in mechanics that get ridd of the "Problem People" If there are no easy targets they will quit and I dare say that for each griefer gone 4 carebares will take his place... 4:1 ratio its totaly worth pushing every last one of them out of the game... They are in the way of progress, they are not contributing to the betterment of the game, They have to go, Every last one of the litte griefer cockroaches have to be shown the Exit door. 0/10 from the carebear...
Eve is about PvP (Everyone Vs Everyone!!!). The last thing it needs is to turn high sec into a pure PvE world...
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
74
|
Posted - 2011.11.21 12:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fark - double post :(
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
74
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 02:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ambassadeur Ur-Shulgi wrote:Halcyon Ingenium wrote:The solution is a counter bribe system, with minimum and maximum bribes that are made by each side of the "war", before it starts.
Wardeccer makes bribe, 24hr countdown begins. Target makes counterbribe, 24hr countdown resets and pauses. Wardeccer can either make a counter bribe which exceeds are equals the last counter bribe, restarting the 24hr countdown, up to the max, or find someone poorer. If counterbribe, then another counterbribe from the target, equal or greater up to the max, reseting and pausing the countdown. Eventually this will be bribe counter bribe at the max, until someone exhausts their wallet.
The problem with wardecs was always that there was no way to defend, you were in a war in 24hrs whether you were ready or not. At least this way people can get ready, or possibly drive off the would be attacker with their deep corp wallet.
This is also an awesome isk sink, since all the bribe money is going down the CONCORD drain. OR we go to low sec and fight fair fights instead. or why not go to Null?? instead of acting like a Coward? I know some of you get your kicks from ******* people over. And I have always let it go in the past. But after spending the last 2 years ( was in low and null sec before) in highsec it has become very clear that some of you are ******* this game up. Either its because your are clueless about what you are doing. Or its actually a planed action to wreck EvE... either way it needs to stop.. Just stop posting now Mr Carebear. You are showing your lack on understanding of Eve. What makes you think you get anything close to a fair fight in low sec? When I created my first character and we got the first war dec since I had joined, I WANTED to undock and fight. The issue was the corp wasn't very experienced and lacked organisation to fight back. A few months later, we were in an alliance and get a war dec from a stronger war dec. The corp I was in and one other fought (and lost), whilst others left the alliance. The net result though is that the main corp in the attacking alliance was impressed that they gave some of our main fighters ships, got to know them and my corp joined their alliance. A number of months later, the corps merged and went to null sec to be part of Green Alliance (Atlas renteres) and PvP etc... I lost contact with them and forged my own path (alt is now is CEO of a corp and is teaching noobs to PvP and we are all learning more about griefing etc...) THIS is how the sandbox should work. Not like you hiding in station crying...
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
83
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 02:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
ShipToaster wrote:Any updates? Patch Notes wrote:Insurance is no longer paid out for players who are killed by CONCORD. Does this mean that if players are killed by other players before CONCORD can do so that the insurance is still paid out? Taking that to the logical conclusion - does it mean incurance is not paid out when concord get the FINAL blow, or just if they are on the killmail???
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
83
|
Posted - 2011.12.04 00:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tylerskji wrote:Useful service to us smaller corps with no way to defend ourselves to grief corps other than pay stupid amounts of money to merc corps.
I support this
That is complete and utter crap
1) You miss out on the most fun thing to do in Eve 2) These so called "grief" corps actually reward people who fight back and try with isk/replacement ships and will teach them about PvP 3) You can potentially make friends who will counter dec the next time your corp gets a dec. 4) You've shown your corp members that your corp lacks the spine/guts to tough it out and would rather run from a challenge
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
92
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 04:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
^^ This. The point of Eve is that your opposition can do anything to you that they want if you are not able to prevent them doing it...
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
92
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 06:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mu-Shi Ai wrote:Har Harrison wrote:^^ This. The point of Eve is that your opposition can do anything to you that they want if you are not able to prevent them doing it... Except CONCORD. Seriously, a lot of people want to act like things are only one way in EVE, but they clearly aren't. Yes, there is a large PvP sandbox element in EVE, but it is regulated in various ways. Players figured out how to use a pre-existing mechanic in a novel way, to defend themselves against the "harrassing lawsuit" version of wardecs that run rampant in hi-sec. The devs first decided to treat it as an exploit, but after some consideration, re-allowed it. People use existing mechanics in EVE in all sorts of novel and original ways to circumvent things that would otherwise inconvenience them or make their lives harder (not to mention to scam, trick, bamboozle other players, etc). I'm not sure why your ability to wardec carebears on a whim, knowing that will screw their week up 100% of the time, should be held sacred. I think the question you need to ask yourself is why using game mechanics in unconventional ways always seems to be fine as long as it's not something a carebear can do to affect the way you like to play. Funny how that always seems to be the argument people like you will make in situations like these. I'm fairly certain the devs didn't create the wardec system thinking that it would be used to incessantly harass carebear corps in hi-sec. What would you say if they raised the wardec cost to 500m ISK? Would you be crying about that, too? Many who partake in high sec wars would gladly have a higher cost IF the war targets couldn't hop like they currently do...
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
92
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 05:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
Mu-Shi Ai wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:You came straight here from World of Warcraft, didn't you? That's WoW reasoning. "An effective form of conflict is to call someone a name!" What the hell, man?!? Seriously? You're arguing that as a valid form of conflict resolution for EVE Online? First, no I didn't come here from WoW. Second, are you trying to argue that reputation is so meaningless in EVE that the idea of using it as a means of getting other players to act within certain boundaries of dignity and integrity suitable to their relative positions is pointless? If so, that's a bigger indictment of EVE than it is of some game mechanic you happen not to like. What corp worth entering combat with is going to want a "Dec Shield" badge of shame plastered in its alliance history? And how is the great masses of players supposed to know this??? Unless someone reads it on the forums, its hard to know which corps/alliances are hiding behind a dec shield...
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
135
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 02:44:00 -
[10] - Quote
Just removing dec shields and put a stasis timer on a war dec that stops people leaving/joining a corp within the first few days of a war. At least that way people can still leave/join, but not immediately flee the war/join up to gank someone. Timer should be from when the first active war started if there are multiple going at the same time to prevent people continually throwing rotating decs to stop people joining/leaving.
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
135
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 04:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Har Harrison wrote:Just removing dec shields and put a stasis timer on a war dec that stops people leaving/joining a corp within the first few days of a war. At least that way people can still leave/join, but not immediately flee the war/join up to gank someone. Timer should be from when the first active war started if there are multiple going at the same time to prevent people continually throwing rotating decs to stop people joining/leaving. War decs are fine as they are. High sec griefers need to come to low sec and learnt2play. Or wardec people who want to fight. My alt corp fights high sec wars. They know how to PvP. They do low sec and null sec as well sometimes. Doesn't change the fact that the war dec mechanic is BS and needs fixing!!!
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution
136
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 02:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote: C) They train n00bs - who the **** are you to tell them they can't have x,y,z number of characters over any age? What's the cut-off? Who decides?
If they're asking for and receiving special protections on the basis of their claim that their purpose is to train new players, then a high percentage of relatively old characters (who are not actively teaching) would tend to work against that claim. In addition asking for special protections and receiving special protections would seem to me to work against their stated mission of training new players in all aspects of EvE; a game where nobody's special and nobody's safe. If they weren't asking for nor receiving special protections, then the decision would be moot, and the community would decide if they wanted to punish those who attacked E-Uni. This man does make a valid point...
+1 Internets for posting a clear and concise arguement
Fix Faction Warfare CCP!!! |
|
|